Content Moderation and the Constitution: The Supreme Court's Social Media Cases

1.5 Substantive credits

On February 26, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two NetChoice cases: NetChoice v. Paxton and Moody v. NetChoice. Both address whether states can enact laws that bar social media platforms from moderating content posted by users. This program will review the Florida and Texas laws, the issues presented and First Amendment implications, lower courts’ conflicting rulings, and possible U.S. Supreme Court rulings and their effect on “free expression.” In addition, the panel will examine Murthy v. Missouri, to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18. In this case, a lower court ruled that several federal agencies committed First Amendment violations concerning COVID-19 and other public health communications to social media platforms.


Your Instructor


Penn Carey Law
Penn Carey Law

Course Curriculum


  Content Moderation and the Constitution: The Supreme Court's Social Media Cases
Available in days
days after you enroll

Frequently Asked Questions


When does the course start and finish?
The course starts now and never ends! It is a completely self-paced online course - you decide when you start and when you finish.
How long do I have access to the course?
How does lifetime access sound? After enrolling, you have unlimited access to this course for as long as you like - across any and all devices you own.
What if I am unhappy with the course?
We would never want you to be unhappy! If you are unsatisfied with your purchase, contact us in the first 30 days and we will give you a full refund.

Get started now!